[personal profile] squirmelia
Tree
In Richmond, [livejournal.com profile] wintrmute and I walk past boats full of flowers and lanes of nightingales.

Parakeets fly out of gnarled trees that look orange in the fading light, and on King Henry VIII's Mound, people peer into the mist, hoping to see St Paul's Cathedral through a telescope. I climb into a partially hollow tree, surrounding myself with rotting wood. There are little holes that I notice, probably caused by a xylophagous creature, before extricating myself and jumping back outside to the real world.

It is then that the sunset blooms from the sky, in pink, blue, orange and yellow, and it is then that the trees appear as silhouettes, but it is later that we eat deep fried artichokes.

Date: 2007-02-06 11:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] albatros.livejournal.com
Ahhh yes, silhouettes of trees against coloured sunsets - very good if you can pull it off, which you have just nicely. You seem to have a good knack with that (and other pics in the past, I notice you seem to use all the good tricks!)

Date: 2007-02-07 10:06 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pgd.livejournal.com
Agreed, some beautiful pics there. Any tips for taking this type of shot?

Date: 2007-02-07 10:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] albatros.livejournal.com
Underexpose! Cameras usually overexpose and 'blow out' colours, e.g. orange turns to yellow and colours desaturate. Digital cameras are very unforgiving of overexposure. If you have a way of looking at the light levels on the actual recorded image (e.g. a histogram), ensure that there is no light at the very highest light levels.

If you're lucky enough to have a camera that has RAW recording, and the software to read them, then go for this option if you think you might need to 'stretch out' any areas or rescue shadows (which you generally don't for silhouettes, but you might want to pull out detail in clouds).

Anyhoo, I don't want to dominate this thread :o) Anyone else?

Date: 2007-02-07 10:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] albatros.livejournal.com
Oh, and smaller aperture (F10) and a tripod.

Date: 2007-02-07 04:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pgd.livejournal.com
Thanks! Sounds fairly straightforward, then (apart from the image processing, which I think I'm quite a way from getting into just yet!) ... I've tried taking sunset shots before and found underexposure to be the way forward. Is the point of the small aperture just to limit the light a bit more? I can't imagine depth-of-field mattering if you're shooting the sky...

Date: 2007-02-07 05:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] albatros.livejournal.com
DoF: helps keep the branches of the trees sharp, if you're fairly close to them. With a wider aperture, light tends to 'leak around' the detail of the branches, and you end up losing some of the finer twigs, even if they're only slightly off the focal range.

Date: 2007-02-09 12:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] darklily.livejournal.com
Thank you ever so much for the card, frog, and chocolate! The latter was very tasty, and the former two shall be treasured forever. :)

Date: 2007-02-09 10:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] squirmelia.livejournal.com
Sorry it took so long to send! I suppose at least it got there before 2010. :)

Profile

squirmelia: (Default)
squirmelia

December 2025

S M T W T F S
  1234 56
78910111213
1415 1617 181920
21222324252627
28 29 3031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 30th, 2025 10:38 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios